DeepSeek Is Not the Killer Whale the Media Told Us

Disclaimer: Focusing on the Here and Now

Before diving into the discussion of DeepSeek versus ChatGPT-4, let’s set one thing straight: this article does not delve into the back-end infrastructure, the training costs, or the theoretical long-term potential of these AI models. Those are discussions for another day. Instead, we’re focusing on the present—what is actually available to users right now. What matters most is whether an AI tool is functional, accessible, and useful in daily life. And when it comes to that, DeepSeek falls flat.

The DeepSeek Illusion: Media Hype vs. Reality

DeepSeek’s launch created a media storm, briefly shaking up the stock market and leading many to believe it could challenge OpenAI’s dominance in the AI space. However, this excitement was largely manufactured. While headlines proclaimed it as a game-changer, real-world usage tells a different story. DeepSeek lacks fundamental features, making it impractical for serious AI interaction. Unlike ChatGPT-4, which has been meticulously refined to enhance user experience, DeepSeek is a limited, static chatbot with severe shortcomings.

DeepSeek’s Severe Functional Limitations

A quick breakdown of what DeepSeek lacks compared to ChatGPT-4 highlights just how far behind it actually is:

• No Voice Interaction – Unlike ChatGPT-4, DeepSeek does not support voice input, making it feel outdated in an era where speaking to AI is faster and more natural than typing.
• No Read-Aloud Feature – ChatGPT-4 allows users to hear responses, making it a more immersive and accessible experience. DeepSeek offers no such capability.
• No Custom GPTs – Users can create tailored AI models with ChatGPT-4, a feature DeepSeek completely lacks.
• No Plugin Support – ChatGPT-4 integrates with a variety of plugins, making it adaptable and functional for different tasks. DeepSeek remains rigid and isolated.
• No Image Generation – ChatGPT-4 allows for AI-generated images, while DeepSeek remains text-only.
• Lack of Chat Memory – Unlike ChatGPT-4, which can recall past conversations to provide context-aware responses, DeepSeek resets after each session.
• Limited Coverage of Certain Topics – DeepSeek struggles with certain subjects, particularly those tied to Western ideologies, such as Christianity.
• No Advanced Data Analysis – ChatGPT-4 can process complex data sets, making it useful for business and research applications. DeepSeek does not offer this feature.

These missing elements make DeepSeek not just a less powerful tool but also a less intuitive and practical one. A product that lacks essential AI capabilities is not a “future competitor”—it’s just another AI experiment that falls short of actual usability.

The Apex of AI: Accessibility & Seamless Integration

ChatGPT-4 is built for the real world—it’s not just an advanced chatbot; it’s an adaptive tool designed to integrate seamlessly into everyday life. AI should be:

1. Completely Accessible – Whether someone is visually impaired, has limited mobility, or simply prefers to listen rather than read, an AI should cater to all users. DeepSeek does not.
2. Seamless in Workflow – People use AI to enhance their efficiency, not slow them down. ChatGPT-4’s combination of text, voice, and read-aloud options allows users to integrate AI into their routines naturally.
3. Useful in Everyday Scenarios – Imagine being at the supermarket, trying to figure out if an ingredient will work in a recipe while your kid is screaming. With ChatGPT-4, you can simply ask aloud and get an instant response—no need to type. DeepSeek, on the other hand, forces you into an outdated input method that just doesn’t work in fast-paced environments.

DeepSeek doesn’t understand this fundamental shift in AI usage. It’s a static chatbot in a world that demands fluid, multimodal AI interaction.

DeepSeek Is Just the Equilibrium—Not the Matrix

DeepSeek only proves that alternatives to existing AI models can be built, but that does not mean they are better. This is not groundbreaking. In the near future, just as nearly everyone owns a smartphone today, almost everyone will have access to their own personalized AI chatbot. The ability to train an AI model at a lower cost is not an achievement—it’s an inevitability.

But training a cheaper AI does not make it a stronger or more useful AI. DeepSeek lacks the muscle and capability of ChatGPT-4. It does not provide the same depth, flexibility, or adaptability, which means it cannot be considered an equal competitor. It’s one thing to build an AI model—it’s another to create something that fundamentally enhances human interaction and workflow.

Instead of Chasing Hype, Support What Already Works

One of the biggest mistakes people make in the tech world is constantly chasing the “next big thing” without evaluating whether the current tool they’re using is already the best. ChatGPT-4 is already the gold standard in AI—it works, it’s practical, and it evolves based on real-world use cases.

DeepSeek, on the other hand, is not an upgrade. It’s not a competitor. It’s a distraction.

The media-driven push for DeepSeek is not about innovation; it’s about shifting attention away from the fact that OpenAI is still miles ahead. Americans, in particular, should recognize that OpenAI, a company built in the U.S., is leading AI development. Supporting DeepSeek doesn’t encourage competition—it fuels the race to the bottom, where rushed, underdeveloped AI models are treated as revolutionary despite lacking even the most basic features.

Conclusion

DeepSeek is not the future of AI—it’s an illusion created by media spin. It lacks the fundamental tools necessary for modern AI, and it completely ignores the direction AI is actually headed. Meanwhile, ChatGPT-4 continues to push boundaries, offering users a multi-faceted, intuitive, and accessible AI experience.

AI is about making life easier, more efficient, and more adaptable. If a product doesn’t achieve that, it’s simply not worth considering. DeepSeek may have been framed as the killer whale in the AI space by the media, but for now, it has the assertiveness of a former president eating ice cream at the beach.